Opinion
3:22-CV-1078-S-BH
08-15-2022
ASHLEY NEICE, Plaintiff, v. KAUFMAN COUNTY JAIL, Defendant.
Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge ]
By Special Order No. 3-251, this pro se prisoner case has been automatically referred for full case management.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the case should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or follow court orders.
I. BACKGROUND
The pro se prisoner plaintiff filed this civil rights action against the defendant on May 13, 2022. (See doc. 3.) By Notice of Deficiency and Order dated May 16, 2022, she was notified that she had not filed her complaint on the appropriate form and paid the filing fee or submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (See doc. 4.) Attached to the order were copies of the civil rights complaint form and an IFP application. See id. The order specifically advised the plaintiff that she must file her complaint on the proper form and either pay the filing fee or file her IFP application within thirty days, and that a failure to do so could result in the dismissal of the case. Id. More than thirty days from the date of the order have passed, but the plaintiff has not filed her complaint on the proper form and paid the filing fee or filed an IFP application, and she has not filed anything else.
II. INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a court to dismiss an action sua sponte for failure to prosecute or follow orders of the court. McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988) (§ 1983 prisoner action). This authority flows from a court's inherent power to control its docket, prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases, and avoid congested court calendars. Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-31 (1962). The plaintiff failed to comply with the order that she file her complaint on the proper form and pay the filing fee or submit an IFP application despite a warning that failure to do so could result in dismissal of the case, and she has not filed anything else. Because the plaintiff failed to follow a court order or otherwise show that she intends to proceed with this case, it should be dismissed.
III. RECOMMENDATION
This case should be dismissed without prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or follow orders of the court, unless the plaintiff files her complaint on the proper form and either pays the filing fee or submits a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis within the time for objecting to this recommendation, or by some other deadline set by the court.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL/OBJECT
A copy of these findings, conclusions, and recommendation shall be served on all parties in the manner provided by law. Any party who objects to any part of these findings, conclusions and recommendation must file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). In order to be specific, an objection must identify the specific finding or recommendation to which objection is made, state the basis for the objection, and specify the place in the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions and recommendation where the disputed determination is found. An objection that merely incorporates by reference or refers to the briefing before the magistrate judge is not specific. Failure to file specific written objections will bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge that are accepted or adopted by the district court, except upon grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Automobile Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996).