From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neely v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jul 21, 1972
497 P.2d 898 (Nev. 1972)

Opinion

No. 6318

June 7, 1972 Rehearing denied July 21, 1972

Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Llewellyn A. Young, Judge.

J. Rayner Kjeldsen, of Reno, for Appellant.

Robert List, Attorney General, William Macdonald, District Attorney, and John Doyle, Deputy District Attorney, Humboldt County, for Respondent.


OPINION


Appellant contends that, for various reasons, the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce at trial certain testimony previously given at appellant's preliminary hearing. Whatever the merits of such contentions might be if appellant's counsel had made a timely objection, stating specific grounds, these issues have not been properly preserved for our review. Merica v. State, 87 Nev. 457, 488 P.2d 1161 (1971); Kelley v. State, 76 Nev. 65, 348 P.2d 966 (1960); NRS 47.040(1)(a).

Other assignments of error are without merit.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Neely v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jul 21, 1972
497 P.2d 898 (Nev. 1972)
Case details for

Neely v. State

Case Details

Full title:CORA NEELY, ALSO KNOWN AS CODY WATKINS, ALSO KNOWN AS CORRINE LYELL…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jul 21, 1972

Citations

497 P.2d 898 (Nev. 1972)
497 P.2d 898

Citing Cases

Eubanks v. State

To the extent Eubanks may construe the motion for a mistrial as an objection to the admission of the…