From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nedab v. Lencer

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 20, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-54 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 20, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-54 Erie.

March 20, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on March 2, 2006 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on February 28, 2007, recommended that the Defendant's motion [Doc. # 7] to dismiss be granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at his last address of record, and on the Defendant. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 20th Day of March 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant's motion [Doc. # 7] to dismiss is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED.

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated February 28, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of this Court.


Summaries of

Nedab v. Lencer

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 20, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-54 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 20, 2007)
Case details for

Nedab v. Lencer

Case Details

Full title:ABDUL NEDAB, Plaintiff, v. TIM LENCER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 20, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-54 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 20, 2007)

Citing Cases

Zahir v. Mountcastle

d that the decision whether to file criminal charges against an individual lies within the prosecutor's…

WINSTON v. RIEL

discussing prosecutorial discretion); Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973) (finding that a…