From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nebgen v. Schentag

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 31, 2020
18 CIVIL 8410 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 8410 (ER)

03-31-2020

GEORGE NEBGEN, PARVIZ GHAHRAMANI, and THERAHOLDINGS AG (SA Ltd.) Plaintiffs, v. JEROME J. SCHENTAG, MARY P. McCOURT, LAWRENCE MIELNICKI, JULIE HUGHES, and THERASYN SENSORS, INC., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 31, 2020, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted and Defendants' motion to transfer venue is denied; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 31, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Nebgen v. Schentag

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 31, 2020
18 CIVIL 8410 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Nebgen v. Schentag

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE NEBGEN, PARVIZ GHAHRAMANI, and THERAHOLDINGS AG (SA Ltd.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 31, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 8410 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2020)