From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neal v. Melissa Foster, L.P.N.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 21, 2012
CASE NO. 3:12-0938 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 21, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:12-0938

11-21-2012

DENNIS PAUL NEAL, Plaintiff, v. MELISSA FOSTER, L.P.N., et al., Defendants.


JUDGE CAMPBELL/KNOWLES


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On November 9, 2012, the undersigned entered an Order granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time. Docket No. 15. A copy of that Order was sent to the pro se Plaintiff at the Davidson County Sheriff's Office, the address provided in material he filed with his Complaint. The referenced Order, however, was returned to the Clerk's Office with the notation on the envelope, "Released 10/6/12." Docket No. 20. Additionally, the "Tennessee Felony Offender Information Lookup" website shows that the supervision status for Dennis Paul Neal, TOMIS ID #286899 is, "Probation." See https://apps.tn.gov/foil/results.jsp , accessed November 21, 2012.

Judge Campbell previously entered an Order in this action that states in relevant part, "[Plaintiff] is also forewarned that his prosecution of this action will be jeopardized if he fails to keep the Clerk's Office informed of his current address." Docket No. 4, p. 2.

It is apparent that Plaintiff has not kept the Clerk's Office informed of his current address.

For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that this action be DISMISSED.

Under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any party has fourteen (14) days after service of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to this Recommendation with the District Court. Any party opposing said objections shall have fourteen (14) days after service of any objections filed to this Report in which to file any response to said objections. Failure to file specific objections within fourteen (14) days of service of this Report and Recommendation can constitute a waiver of further appeal of this Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.

_________________

E. Clifton Knowles

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Neal v. Melissa Foster, L.P.N.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 21, 2012
CASE NO. 3:12-0938 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Neal v. Melissa Foster, L.P.N.

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS PAUL NEAL, Plaintiff, v. MELISSA FOSTER, L.P.N., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 3:12-0938 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 21, 2012)