From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neal v. J. C. Streeval

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Nov 17, 2021
7:21CV00380 (W.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

7:21CV00380

11-17-2021

DENARD DARNELL NEAL, Petitioner, v. J. C. STREEVAL, ET AL., Respondents.

Denard Darnell Neal, Pro Se Petitioner.


Denard Darnell Neal, Pro Se Petitioner.

OPINION

James P. Jones, Senior United States District Judge

The petitioner, Denard Darnell Neal, proceeding pro se, has filed a pleading purporting to invoke habeas corpus jurisdiction. The court liberally construed and docketed his filing as a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Generously construed, Neal alleges in this Petition that under various purported provisions of civil and commercial law, he should be released from confinement under his federal criminal sentence. After reviewing his submissions, I find that Neal's petition must be summarily dismissed.

Neal is currently confined at the United States Penitentiary Lee (“USP Lee”), located in this judicial district. His Petition consists of 48 pages and dozens of attached exhibits. While his submissions use English words, sentences, and punctuation, and cite supposed legal documents and provisions of law, I cannot find any logical, factual, or legal bases on which I have authority to order Neal's release from confinement in federal prison, an objective that he seeks to achieve. As a prior court has held in dismissing a previous submission from Neal, “the questions raised . . . are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.” United States v. Neal, 263 Fed.Appx. 572 (9th Cir. 2008) (unpublished). Therefore, without further discussion, I will summarily dismiss Neal's Petition without prejudice, because it fails to demonstrate any ground for habeas relief.

Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing section 2254 Cases in the United states District Courts, which may be applied to § 2241 cases under Rule 1(b), “[i]f it plainly appears from the [face of a § 2241] petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge must dismiss the petition and direct the clerk to notify petitioner.”

A separate Final Order will be entered herewith.


Summaries of

Neal v. J. C. Streeval

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Nov 17, 2021
7:21CV00380 (W.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Neal v. J. C. Streeval

Case Details

Full title:DENARD DARNELL NEAL, Petitioner, v. J. C. STREEVAL, ET AL., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

7:21CV00380 (W.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2021)