standing to sue as additional insured when named in insurance policy
Summary of this case from Optimus Indus. LLC v. Factory Mut. Ins. Co.No. 56761-6-I.
February 20, 2007.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-2-41520-1, Michael J. Fox, J., entered July 22, 2005.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by unpublished opinion per Schindler, A.C.J., concurred in by Becker and Ellington, JJ.
standing to sue as additional insured when named in insurance policy
Summary of this case from Optimus Indus. LLC v. Factory Mut. Ins. Co.standing to sue as additional insured when named in insurance policy
Summary of this case from Factory Sales & Eng'g, Inc. v. Factory Mut. Ins. Co.Full title:NCF FINANCIAL, INC., Appellant, v. ST. PAUL FIRE MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY…
Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Date published: Feb 20, 2007
Because Will Repair had no “physical evidence to show what happened” to its missing property, its loss was…
Optimus Indus. LLC v. Factory Mut. Ins. Co.See generally, Dkt. 1, 11. Because Chanute is not named as an Additional Insured in any relevant…