From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Navas v. Byron

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 9, 2013
3:11-cv-00868-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00868-LRH-VPC

04-09-2013

JULIO CESAR NAVAS, Plaintiff, v. ANNA MARIE BYRON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#16) entered on February 26, 2013, recommending dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff's First Amended Civil Rights Complaint (#9), filed on October 3, 2012. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#16) entered on February 26, 2013, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#16) entered on February 26, 2013, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's First Amended Civil Rights Complaint (#9) is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Navas v. Byron

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 9, 2013
3:11-cv-00868-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Navas v. Byron

Case Details

Full title:JULIO CESAR NAVAS, Plaintiff, v. ANNA MARIE BYRON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 9, 2013

Citations

3:11-cv-00868-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)