Navarro v. State

Full title: FERNANDO NAVARRO, JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 14, 2019

No. 75525-COA (Nev. App. Mar. 14, 2019)

Opinion

No. 75525-COA

03-14-2019

FERNANDO NAVARRO, JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Tao

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Fernando Navarro, Jr., appeals from a district court order denying a motion for credit for time served filed on December 1, 2017. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, we lack jurisdiction. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.¹

1 A claim for additional presentence credit is a challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction and sentence and therefore must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Griffin v. State, 122 Nev. 737, 744, 137 P.3d 1165, 1169 (2006). We express no opinion as to whether Navarro could meet the procedural requirements of NRS Chapter 34. --------

/s/_________, J.

Tao /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Bulla cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge

Fernando Navarro, Jr.

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk