From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Navarro v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Mar 4, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-02473-EFB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-02473-EFB

03-04-2013

GILBERT NAVARRO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

GLENN M. CLARK Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
GRACE M. KIM
Regional Chief Counsel
DANIEL P. TALBERT
Special Assistant United States Attorney

Social Security Administration

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8926

Facsimile: (415) 977-8873
Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO

SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),

AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN

FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST

DEFENDANT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four.

Upon remand from the Court, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for a new hearing and a new decision. The parties note that the Commissioner is not required to conduct an additional ALJ hearing in this matter; rather, the Commissioner's Hearings, Appeals, and Litigation Law Manual (HALLEX) provides that the Appeals Council may, at its discretion, issue a decision without remand to an ALJ. See HALLEX I-4-3-80. If the Appeals Council decides that remand to an ALJ is necessary, it will direct the ALJ to evaluate the claimant's impairments under Listing 1.02A as well as any other listing that Plaintiff argues he meets or equals. If the ALJ finds that Plaintiff does not meet or equal any listing, he should evaluate the credibility of Plaintiff's subjective complaints, determine his residual functional capacity, and determine whether he can perform his past relevant work or other jobs existing in significant numbers in the national economy. The ALJ should set forth good reasons for the weight that he gives to any treating source opinion in the record, and, if he finds Plaintiff's testimony less than fully credible, he should provide specific reasons for so finding supported by evidence in the record.

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________

GLENN M. CLARK

(as authorized by email)

Attorney for Plaintiff

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ____________________

DANIEL P. TALBERT

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.

____________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Navarro v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Mar 4, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-02473-EFB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Navarro v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT NAVARRO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-02473-EFB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)