Summary
noting that the NAM case “does not carry the constitutional weight that Plaintiffs ascribe to it” and that the case “did not announce a First Amendment holding”
Summary of this case from Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.Opinion
Civil No. 1:13–cv–01998 (APM)
05-07-2015
National Association of Manufacturers, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Thomas Perez, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, et al., Defendants.
Christopher J. Lalak, Peter N. Kirsanow, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aranoff LLP, Maynard A. Buck, Patrick O. Peters, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aranoff, Cleveland, OH, Gregory F. Jacob, O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Adam D. Kirschner, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant.
Christopher J. Lalak, Peter N. Kirsanow, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aranoff LLP, Maynard A. Buck, Patrick O. Peters, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aranoff, Cleveland, OH, Gregory F. Jacob, O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.
Adam D. Kirschner, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION