From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Fennimore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1996
224 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 5, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Appellant's contention that the plaintiff waived its right to a trial de novo under the facts presented in this case is without merit (see Allstate Ins. Co. v. Jacobs, 208 A.D.2d 578; Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Alvarez, 207 A.D.2d 401). Unlike the parties in the cases of Matter of Marciano v. General Acc. Ins. Co. ( 220 A.D.2d 748) and Matter of Eckart v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. ( 208 A.D.2d 533), the parties in this case proceeded to arbitration in accordance with the policy provisions and, therefore, the plaintiff could invoke its right under the policy to a trial de novo.

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit. Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Fennimore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1996
224 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Fennimore

Case Details

Full title:NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. BARBARA A. FENNIMORE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 328

Citing Cases

Pennsylvania General Ins. Co. v. Mortenson

We conclude that the parties proceeded to arbitration in accordance with the provisions of the policy of…

Matter of Sefcik

Supreme Court erred in denying respondent's cross petition seeking to vacate the award and to schedule a…