From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nasso v. Loeb Loeb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 2005
19 A.D.3d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-03763.

June 13, 2005.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Solomon, J.), dated March 29, 2004, which granted the defendant's motion to stay the prosecution of the action pending arbitration.

Hantman Associates, New York, N.Y. (Robert J. Hantman of counsel), for appellant.

Piper Rudnick, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Mark C. Zauderer, Jonathan D. Lupkin, and Peter D. Sharp of counsel), and Hall Hall, LLP, Staten Island, N.Y., for respondent (one brief filed).

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the arbitration clause at issue contained in the parties' March 29, 2000, retainer agreement is clear, explicit, and unequivocal, and all of the plaintiff's claims fall within the broad scope of this arbitration clause ( see Stoll Am. Knitting Mach. v. Creative Knitwear Corp., 5 AD3d 586). Moreover, since the plaintiff was unable to raise a substantial question as to whether a valid agreement to arbitrate was made, no hearing was warranted on that issue ( see Matter of Cassone, 100 AD2d 606). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion to stay prosecution of the action pending arbitration.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Nasso v. Loeb Loeb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 2005
19 A.D.3d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Nasso v. Loeb Loeb

Case Details

Full title:JULIUS R. NASSO, Appellant, v. LOEB LOEB, LLP, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 13, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
796 N.Y.S.2d 256

Citing Cases

Stark v. Molod Spitz DeSantis Stark, P.C

In this matter, the arbitration provision in the parties' employment agreement clearly provides that: "the…

News Networks v. Loeb

When it retained the services of defendants, the commercially sophisticated plaintiff executed an engagement…