From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nassar v. Canandaigua Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 28, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ontario County, Henry, Jr., J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs commenced this action to foreclose a mortgage given by defendants Richard Gollel and Canandaigua Development Corporation in connection with the purchase of the stock of defendant Canandaigua Development Corporation. Defendants have failed to come forward with evidence sufficient to create a question of fact whether plaintiffs fraudulently induced them to enter into the agreement. Defendants' conclusory and unsubstantiated allegations of fraud were insufficient to defeat plaintiffs' motion (Barclays Bank v Sokol, 128 A.D.2d 492).


Summaries of

Nassar v. Canandaigua Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 28, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Nassar v. Canandaigua Development Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN J. NASSAR, SR., et al., Respondents, v. CANANDAIGUA DEVELOPMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 28, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 663

Citing Cases

Gollel v. Nassar

On appeal to this Court, we held that plaintiffs failed to come forward with evidence sufficient to create a…