From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nasby v. McDaniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 10, 2013
3:07-cv-0304-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

3:07-cv-0304-LRH-RAM

05-10-2013

BRENDAN NASBY, Petitioner, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Before the Court is petitioner's Motion to Attach Supplemental Exhibits to Petitioner's Reply (ECF No. 75). In the motion, petitioner explains that the exhibits were referenced in his reply brief, but he was unable to obtain copies of the exhibits before the filing deadline.

Respondents have not opposed the motion and it shall be granted. The clerk is directed to detach and file the Supplemental Exhibits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nasby v. McDaniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 10, 2013
3:07-cv-0304-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Nasby v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:BRENDAN NASBY, Petitioner, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

3:07-cv-0304-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. May. 10, 2013)