From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Narrell v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jul 13, 1932
13 P.2d 597 (Okla. Crim. App. 1932)

Opinion

No. A-8304.

March 4, 1932. Rehearing Denied July 13, 1932.

(Syllabus.)

Intoxicating Liquors — Conviction for Possession of Still Sustained. There is nothing in the record to warrant the court in modifying the judgment.

Appeal from County Court, Okfuskee County; Arthur Cochran, Judge.

J. J. Narrell pleaded guilty of having the possession of a still, and was sentenced accordingly, and he appeals. Judgment affirmed.

S. H. Davis, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., and Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, entered his plea of guilty, and was sentenced by the court to pay a fine of $250, and to be imprisoned in the county jail for 60 days, and appeals.

The defendant urges that the punishment imposed is excessive, and that he should have received the same sentence as other parties who entered their pleas on the same day that the defendant entered his plea and received his sentence.

The defendant was by information charged with having possession of a still. There is nothing in the record to show any reason why the sentence of the court should be modified, or to show that the court erred in imposing the sentence upon the defendant. There is no testimony in the record, and the presumption is the court imposed such a sentence as it deemed commensurate with the crime committed.

Finding no error in the record sufficient to warrant a reversal, the judgment is affirmed.

CHAPPELL, J., concurs. EDWARDS, J., absent, not participating.


Summaries of

Narrell v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jul 13, 1932
13 P.2d 597 (Okla. Crim. App. 1932)
Case details for

Narrell v. State

Case Details

Full title:J. J. NARRELL v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 13, 1932

Citations

13 P.2d 597 (Okla. Crim. App. 1932)
13 P.2d 597