From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NAR Sols. v. Kuhn

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 24, 2022
No. 2022-C-00425 (La. May. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2022-C-00425

05-24-2022

NAR SOLUTIONS, INC. v. BRYAN K. KUHN


IN RE: NAR Solutions, Inc. - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Writ Of Certiorari, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Number(s) 803-040, Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number(s) 21-CA-256;

Writ application granted - See briefing notice and Order.

JBM

JLW

JDH

SJC

JTG

WJC

PDG

CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN L WEIMER JUSTICES WILLIAM J CRAIN SCOTT J CRICHTON JAMES T GENOVESE JAY B MCCALLUM JEFFERSON D HUGHES III PIPER D GRIFFIN

NOTE: FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES WRIT GRANTED May 24, 2022

MEMORANOUM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:

Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time or oral argument will be mailed out.

Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court provides that the applicant or relator, as the case may be, must file their briefs on or before June 20, 2022; and the respondent on or before July 8, 2022.

Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.

It is further provided in Rule VII. Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it was timely fled. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official United Stales postmark or by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing which indicates the date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.

Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if received by the clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.

With kindest regards, I remain,

On Writ of Certiorari Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, No. 803-040; Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 21-CA-256.

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5. Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.

Witness the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on this 18th day of May, in the year of our Lord, Two Thousand Twenty-Two.


Summaries of

NAR Sols. v. Kuhn

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 24, 2022
No. 2022-C-00425 (La. May. 24, 2022)
Case details for

NAR Sols. v. Kuhn

Case Details

Full title:NAR SOLUTIONS, INC. v. BRYAN K. KUHN

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: May 24, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-C-00425 (La. May. 24, 2022)