From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nappier v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Oct 16, 2018
559 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105816

10-16-2018

Donald R. NAPPIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Damien De Loyola, Amanda R. Langenheim, Co-Counsel, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO. 65203, for appellant. Julia E. Neidhardt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.


Damien De Loyola, Amanda R. Langenheim, Co-Counsel, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO. 65203, for appellant.

Julia E. Neidhardt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald R. Nappier appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2014) motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).


Summaries of

Nappier v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Oct 16, 2018
559 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Nappier v. State

Case Details

Full title:Donald R. NAPPIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Oct 16, 2018

Citations

559 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)