From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nance v. Hulin

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1929
148 S.E. 38 (N.C. 1929)

Opinion

(Filed 15 May, 1929.)

Appeal and Error J d — Burden of showing error is on appellant.

On appeal to the Supreme Court the burden of showing error is on the appellant.

CIVIL ACTION, before Sinclair, J., at April Term, 1928, of MONTGOMERY.

W. A. Cochran for plaintiff.

Brittain, Brittain Brittain for defendant.


The facts are stated in a former appeal reported in 192 N.C. 665, 135 S.E. 774.

Two issues were submitted to the jury. The issue of indebtedness was answered in favor of defendants, and from judgment upon the verdict plaintiff appealed.


The evidence presents an issue of fact and no more. No reversible error is pointed out, and the burden to show such error is upon the appellant.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Nance v. Hulin

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1929
148 S.E. 38 (N.C. 1929)
Case details for

Nance v. Hulin

Case Details

Full title:C. H. NANCE v. J. A. AND J. H. HULIN

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1929

Citations

148 S.E. 38 (N.C. 1929)
197 N.C. 222