From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Company

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Feb 19, 1926
76 Cal.App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926)

Opinion

Docket No. 3075.

February 19, 1926.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. J.E. Woolley, Judge. Affirmed.

Williams Fenstermacher for Appellant.

L.L. Cory, W.H. Stammer and B.H. Cory for Respondents.


The defendant Highway Farming Company has appealed from the judgment herein in favor of plaintiffs against that company and in favor of defendants Ardzrooni Bros. against the plaintiffs. The appeal is submitted upon the briefs and oral arguments in the case of Tanaka and others against the same defendants ( ante, p. 590 [ 245 P. 434]). But one point is made by the appellant, and that the same as made in the Tanaka case, and the facts material to the appeals are the same in both cases.

[1] For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the Tanaka case, the judgment is affirmed.

Pullen, J., pro tem., and Plummer, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Company

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Feb 19, 1926
76 Cal.App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926)
Case details for

Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Company

Case Details

Full title:K. NAKAGAWA et al., Respondents, v. HIGHWAY FARMING COMPANY (a…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Feb 19, 1926

Citations

76 Cal.App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926)
245 P. 435