From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Na'im v. Stringfellow

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 28, 2022
4:21-cv-1154-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2022)

Opinion

4:21-cv-1154-DPM

06-28-2022

NUUH AMIR NA'IM #116249 PLAINTIFF v. LOREN STRINGFELLOW, Dentist DEFENDANT


ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court withdraws the reference and grants Dr. Stringfellow's motion for reconsideration, Doc. 37. He is correct: Arkansas law requires exhaustion of Na'im's ACRA and tort claims, too. ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-106-301(a). The Court has and will retain supplemental jurisdiction over those claims, which cover the same period as Na'im's § 1983 claim-25 June 2021 through 28 July 2021. The contrary aspects of this Court's 23 May 2022 Order, Doc. 35, are vacated. The Court returns the case to the Magistrate Judge.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Na'im v. Stringfellow

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 28, 2022
4:21-cv-1154-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Na'im v. Stringfellow

Case Details

Full title:NUUH AMIR NA'IM #116249 PLAINTIFF v. LOREN STRINGFELLOW, Dentist DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 28, 2022

Citations

4:21-cv-1154-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2022)