Naidech v. U.C.C. of N.J

Full title: AUGUSTA NAIDECH ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. U.C.C. OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 25, 1946

46 A.2d 734 (N.J. 1946)

46 A.2d 734

Opinion

Submitted February 15, 1946 —

Decided April 25, 1946.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 132 N.J.L. 276, sub nominee Finston Naidech v. U.C.C. of New Jersey.

For the respondents, William Harris.

For the appellant, Charles A. Malloy ( Herman D. Ringle, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, OLIPHANT, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.