From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nahoe v. Six Unknown Names Agents

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2012
Civil No. 12cv2056 LAB (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 12cv2056 LAB (WMc)

08-22-2012

GUILLERMO V. NAHOE, BOP #34363-198, Plaintiff, v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS; BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States, Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

FOR FAILING TO PAY

FILING FEE REQUIRED

BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR

FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

Plaintiff, a Federal Bureau of Prisons inmate currently incarcerated at CI Big Spring, located in Big Spring, Texas, and proceeding pro se, has filed a one-page complaint entitled "Civil Right Action with the Writ of Summons and Complaint for Federal or Law of State" "under 42 U.S.C. § 1983" (ECF No. 1).

Plaintiff has not prepaid the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action; nor has he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status

All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in any district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay this filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999).

Plaintiff has not prepaid the $350 filing fee required to commence a civil action, nor has he submitted a Motion to Proceed IFP. Therefore, the case must be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Id.

II. Conclusion and Order

For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby:

(1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failing to pay the $350 filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and

(2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $350 civil filing fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b).

Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to proceed further with this action either by paying the full civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), or moving to proceed IFP, his Complaint, which is comprised of single paragraph of virtually incomprehensible legal jargon and seeks unspecified relief from the President of the United States, will be screened and no doubt dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b). See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) "not only permits but requires" the court to sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that fails to state a claim); see also Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing sua sponte screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) of all prisoner complaints).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with this Court's approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis." If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $350 civil filing fee or complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within that time, this action shall remain dismissed without prejudice and without further Order of the Court.

______________

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Nahoe v. Six Unknown Names Agents

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2012
Civil No. 12cv2056 LAB (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Nahoe v. Six Unknown Names Agents

Case Details

Full title:GUILLERMO V. NAHOE, BOP #34363-198, Plaintiff, v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 12cv2056 LAB (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2012)