From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 28, 2005
413 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

No. 03-15955.

June 28, 2005.

D.C. No. CV-03-00208-MJJ.

F. Paul Bland, Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, Washington, DC, Sanford M. Cipinko, Esq., Law Offices of Sanford M. Cipinko, San Francisco, CA, Victoria Ni, Kate Gordon, Esq., Leslie A. Bailey, Esq., Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, PC, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Glenn J. Plattner, Esq., Jenkens and Gilchrist, Morrison Foerster, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, John S. Warnlof, Esq., Warnlof Sumnick, Walnut Creek, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 353. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.


Summaries of

Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 28, 2005
413 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Connie A. NAGRAMPA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAILCOUPS INC.; The American…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 28, 2005

Citations

413 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

South Yuba River Citizens v. National Marine Fisheries Service

Bennett, 520 U.S. at 173. Section 1536(a)(2) clearly imposes a substantive duty on federal agencies, and the…