From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nadeau v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 15, 2006
920 So. 2d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D05-1403.

February 15, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Amy Smith, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-CF015235A02.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and John M. Conway, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Myra J. Fried, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse the order of revocation of appellant's probation. The trial court found a violation of probation based upon testimony that appellant committed a battery. However, the evidence presented by the state was entirely hearsay. "Hearsay, though admissible in a probation revocation hearing, is insufficient standing alone to establish a violation of a condition of probation." Wilcox v. State, 770 So.2d 733, 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Santiago v. State, 889 So.2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (observation of bruise on victim plus hearsay account of incident was insufficient to prove violation of probation based upon battery). We reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate appellant's probation.

WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nadeau v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 15, 2006
920 So. 2d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Nadeau v. State

Case Details

Full title:Wayne NADEAU, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 15, 2006

Citations

920 So. 2d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Wright v. State

"Hearsay, though admissible in a probation revocation hearing, is insufficient standing alone to establish a…