From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naaman v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 13, 2024
2:23-cv-06184-MRW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-06184-MRW

03-13-2024

VIOLETTE NAAMAN, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Antoinette Safarian, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a South Dakota Corporation; SUSANNA TONERYAN, an individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

Alan Aghabegian, State Bar No. 180159 Dion Estepanian, State Bar No. 339007 Attorneys for Plaintiff VIOLETTE NAAMAN


Alan Aghabegian, State Bar No. 180159

Dion Estepanian, State Bar No. 339007

Attorneys for Plaintiff VIOLETTE NAAMAN

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Michael R. Wilner, United States Magistrate Judge

The Court, having considered the parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby dismisses the above-entitled action with prejudice. The Court vacates all dates and deadlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Naaman v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 13, 2024
2:23-cv-06184-MRW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Naaman v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:VIOLETTE NAAMAN, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Antoinette…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-06184-MRW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2024)