From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naaman v. Fargo

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 5, 2024
CV 23-6184 MRW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-6184 MRW

03-05-2024

Naaman v. Wells Fargo


HON. MICHAEL R. WILNER, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1. This is civil action. The parties consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction in August 2023. Since then, they've filed a series of stipulations to extend the complaint response date (presumably to try to settle the action). The last deadline was in mid-February. (Docket # 15.)

2. The parties blew that date. Neither side has filed anything with the Court since the last stipulation in late December 2023.

3. The parties are each ORDERED to show cause why the Court should not: (a) dismiss the action for failure to prosecute under Rule 41; or (b) enter a default against the defense under Rule 55. The parties will respond to this OSC by declaration or other appropriate filing (including a dismissal of the case, if it's settled) by March 19.

4. Note: The Court will not entertain any additional extension requests.


Summaries of

Naaman v. Fargo

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 5, 2024
CV 23-6184 MRW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Naaman v. Fargo

Case Details

Full title:Naaman v. Wells Fargo

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 5, 2024

Citations

CV 23-6184 MRW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2024)