From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mysell v. C.I.R

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 20, 1932
58 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir. 1932)

Opinion

Nos. 6654-6658.

May 20, 1932.

Upon Petitions to Review Orders of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Philip G. Sheehy, of San Jose, Cal., and A.E. Cooley, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners.

G.A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C.M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NETERER, District Judge.


These causes came on to be heard on the transcripts of record in the above causes, and upon the stipulations of counsel for the respective parties, contained in the transcripts, that the decision of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the petition to review in each of these causes shall abide the decision of said court in the companion case of Chester N. Weaver v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, decided May 16, 1932, 58 F.2d 755.

Upon consideration whereof, it is ordered that a judgment of reversal be filed and entered in each of above causes.


Summaries of

Mysell v. C.I.R

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 20, 1932
58 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir. 1932)
Case details for

Mysell v. C.I.R

Case Details

Full title:Louise MYSELL, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 20, 1932

Citations

58 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir. 1932)

Citing Cases

Price v. United States

Both are clearly admissible. Dunn v. State, 2 Ark. 229, 35 Am. Dec. 54; Harris v. Same, 34 Ark. 469; Brown v.…

Abraham v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

In the case of an obscure or cipher message, of which the import or importance is not apparent to the…