From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myree v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Apr 7, 2017
Case No. 1:01-cr-88-TRM-1 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 7, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:01-cr-88-TRM-1 Case No. 1:17-cv-51

04-07-2017

LEONARD L. MYREE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before the Court is Petitioner's successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 94.) In it, he challenges the propriety of his base offense level under Section 2K2.1(a) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines in light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), which invalidated the residual provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), for unconstitutional vagueness. (Id. (suggesting his sentence is no longer valid because Section 4B1.2 is equally vague).)

The ACCA mandates a fifteen-year sentence for any felon who unlawfully possesses a firearm after having sustained three prior convictions "for a violent felony or a serious drug offense, or both, committed on occasions different from one another." 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). The statute defines "violent felony" as "any crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year" that (1) "has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another" (the "use-of-physical-force clause"); (2) "is burglary, arson, or extortion, involves the use of explosives" (the "enumerated-offense clause"); or (3) "otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another" (the "residual clause"). 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B). It was this third clause—the residual clause—that the Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional in the Johnson decision. 135 S. Ct. at 2563. The Guidelines set a general base offense level of fourteen for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(6). For offenders with one prior conviction for either a "crime of violence" or "controlled substance offense," the base offense level increases to twenty. U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4). Offenders with two such convictions face a base offense level of twenty-four. U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2). "Controlled substance offense" is defined as any offense "punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that prohibits the manufacture, import, export, distribution, or dispensing of a controlled substance . . . or the possession of controlled substance . . . with intent to manufacture, import, export, distribute, or dispense." U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b). "Crime of violence" is defined in an almost identical manner as "violent felony" under the ACCA. See U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a) (adopting identical use-of-force and residual clauses and similar enumerated-offense clause). --------

On March 6, 2017, the Supreme Court held that the United States Sentencing Guidelines are "not amenable to vagueness challenges." Beckles v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 886, 894 (2017). As a result, binding authority now dictates that the Johnson decision does not provide a basis for vacating, setting aside, or correcting Petitioner's base offense level under Section 2K2.1(a).

In accordance with the foregoing, this Court's stay of the instant action will be LIFTED and the successive § 2255 motion (Doc. 94) will be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court will CERTIFY that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. Therefore, this Court will DENY Petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24. Because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Travis R. McDonough

TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Myree v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Apr 7, 2017
Case No. 1:01-cr-88-TRM-1 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Myree v. United States

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD L. MYREE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Apr 7, 2017

Citations

Case No. 1:01-cr-88-TRM-1 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 7, 2017)