From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myhand v. Harris

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 9, 1955
87 S.E.2d 376 (Ga. 1955)

Opinion

18925.

SUBMITTED APRIL 11, 1955.

DECIDED MAY 9, 1955.

Cancellation. Before Judge Boykin. Troup Superior Court. February 7, 1955.

Horace E. Richter, Ken Askew, for plaintiff in error.

Wyatt Morgan, contra.


There has obviously been no attempt to make a brief of the material evidence in this case. As illustrative of this, on page 79 of the alleged brief, there appears a statement of the judge, recessing court until morning and instructing the jury to allow no one to communicate with them. Then on page 100, and comprising practically all of that page, is a motion of defendant's counsel for a directed verdict, the reply of counsel, and the overruling of the motion by the court. The object in changing the rule about briefs of evidence to allow questions and answers (Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., pp. 440, 445) was not intended to relax the rule that there must be a brief of only the evidence.

The exception to a refusal to enter judgment despite the mistrial order is the question we are asked to review, and a consideration of the evidence is indispensable to such a ruling. Therefore, since there is no proper brief of evidence we have no choice but to affirm the judgment. Turner v. Turner, 205 Ga. 578 ( 54 S.E.2d 410); Robinson v. State, 209 Ga. 650 ( 75 S.E.2d 9); Heard v. Helms, 210 Ga. 669 ( 82 S.E.2d 129); McDonald v. Fletcher, 211 Ga. 405 ( 86 S.E.2d 215).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Wyatt, P. J., who is disqualified.

SUBMITTED APRIL 11, 1955 — DECIDED MAY 9, 1955.


Summaries of

Myhand v. Harris

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 9, 1955
87 S.E.2d 376 (Ga. 1955)
Case details for

Myhand v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:MYHAND v. HARRIS

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: May 9, 1955

Citations

87 S.E.2d 376 (Ga. 1955)
211 Ga. 567

Citing Cases

Moore v. Moore

This court has repeatedly held that the stenographic report of the trial of the case may be used in place of…

Montgomery v. State

The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that where there is no bona fide effort to brief the evidence by…