From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. Fir Cab Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 5, 1985
64 N.Y.2d 806 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued January 3, 1985

Decided February 5, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Alfred M. Ascione, J.

Robin Mary Heaney for appellants.

Roy M. Warner for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment denied. We agree with Justice Bentley Kassal (100 A.D.2d, at p 33) that summary judgment is inappropriate where, as here, competing inferences may reasonably be drawn as to whether defendant's conduct constituted negligence.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment denied in a memorandum. Question certified answered in the negative.


Summaries of

Myers v. Fir Cab Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 5, 1985
64 N.Y.2d 806 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Myers v. Fir Cab Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PRINCESS MYERS, an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, DAVID…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 5, 1985

Citations

64 N.Y.2d 806 (N.Y. 1985)
486 N.Y.S.2d 922
476 N.E.2d 321

Citing Cases

Wright v. Akakeo

Only once this prima facie showing has been made does the burden shift to LTW to produce evidentiary proof in…

Wolf Props. Assocs., L.P. v. Castle Restoration, LLC

Mr. Castaldi also affirms that plaintiff was forced to incur costs to clean and clear debris after defendant…