From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. Doherty

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2021
21 CIVIL 219 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)

Opinion

21 CIVIL 219 (PAE)

12-01-2021

RONALD MYERS, Plaintiff, v. INSPECTOR MARY CHRISTINE DOHERTY, LIEUTENANT SEAN CONRY, DEPUTY INSPECTOR JAMES FRANCIS KOBEL, SERGEANT RICHARD BEARY, and the CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated November 30, 2021, defendants' motion to dismiss the AC's federal claims is granted. That dismissal is with prejudice, as the AC was Myers's second complaint, and he has not identified any factual basis on which these claims may be rehabilitated. See Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdictional over its NYCHRL claims. These claims are dismissed without prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed.


Summaries of

Myers v. Doherty

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2021
21 CIVIL 219 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Myers v. Doherty

Case Details

Full title:RONALD MYERS, Plaintiff, v. INSPECTOR MARY CHRISTINE DOHERTY, LIEUTENANT…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

21 CIVIL 219 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)