From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myers v. Carvajal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jun 11, 2015
DOCKET NO. 15-CV-175; SEC. P (W.D. La. Jun. 11, 2015)

Summary

explaining that a Rule 11(c)(C) plea agreement is "contractual and not based upon the guidelines" and that a defendant cannot readily demonstrate prejudice where a Rule 11(c)(C) agreement drove sentencing

Summary of this case from Ruther v. United States

Opinion

DOCKET NO. 15-CV-175; SEC. P

06-11-2015

TERRELL KURT MYERS (#14328-171) v. M. D. CARVAJAL


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KIRK

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed previously herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED THAT the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241 be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 11th day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Myers v. Carvajal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jun 11, 2015
DOCKET NO. 15-CV-175; SEC. P (W.D. La. Jun. 11, 2015)

explaining that a Rule 11(c)(C) plea agreement is "contractual and not based upon the guidelines" and that a defendant cannot readily demonstrate prejudice where a Rule 11(c)(C) agreement drove sentencing

Summary of this case from Ruther v. United States
Case details for

Myers v. Carvajal

Case Details

Full title:TERRELL KURT MYERS (#14328-171) v. M. D. CARVAJAL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Jun 11, 2015

Citations

DOCKET NO. 15-CV-175; SEC. P (W.D. La. Jun. 11, 2015)

Citing Cases

Ruther v. United States

Ruther has identified no evidence to support the claim that he would have been sentenced to anything other…