From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Myecheck, Inc. v. Zipmark, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 31, 2015
No. 14-CV-2399-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)

Opinion

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME TO ANSWER

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

Pursuant to L.R. 143 and L.R. 144, the parties jointly submit this Stipulation.

WHEREAS, on October 10, 2014, plaintiff MyECheck, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed the above-captioned complaint against Zipmark, Inc. and Jay Bhattacharya (collectively "Defendants") (ECF No.1);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff did not serve a copy of the Complaint on Defendants, but Defendants subsequently agreed to waive service pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d);

PAUL D. TRIPODI II, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, Professional Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, ZIPMARK, INC. and JAY BHATTACHARYA.

Brian R. Katz, Attorney for Plaintiff, MyECheck, Inc.

WHEREAS, on December 23, 2014, the parties submitted a joint stipulation waiving service and setting a date of January 8, 2015 for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 5);


WHEREAS, on January 8, 2015, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint in its entirety (ECF No. 6);

WHEREAS, on March 17, 2015, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint, and, inter alia, dismissed all claims against Defendant Jay Bhattacharya (ECF No. 19);

WHEREAS, Defendant Zipmark, Inc. ("Zipmark") has not yet filed an Answer to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, Zipmark's Answer is presently due March 31, 2015;

WHEREAS, the parties would like to have additional time to engage in settlement discussions prior to Zipmark's Answer being filed;

It is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties that Zipmark's time to further respond to the Complaint shall be extended by thirty (30) days, and Zipmark's Answer shall be due no later than April 30, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Myecheck, Inc. v. Zipmark, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 31, 2015
No. 14-CV-2399-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)
Case details for

Myecheck, Inc. v. Zipmark, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MyECHECK, INC. a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. ZIPMARK, INC., JAY…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 31, 2015

Citations

No. 14-CV-2399-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)