From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mut. Home Deal. Corp. v. Commr. of Bank. and Ins

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 15, 1969
259 A.2d 912 (N.J. 1969)

Opinion

Argued December 2, 1969 —

Decided December 15, 1969.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

Mr. W. Louis Bossle argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Walter R. Davis, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Wick in the Chancery Division, 104 N.J. Super. 25.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Mut. Home Deal. Corp. v. Commr. of Bank. and Ins

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 15, 1969
259 A.2d 912 (N.J. 1969)
Case details for

Mut. Home Deal. Corp. v. Commr. of Bank. and Ins

Case Details

Full title:MUTUAL HOME DEALERS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 15, 1969

Citations

259 A.2d 912 (N.J. 1969)
259 A.2d 912

Citing Cases

Patrolman's Benev. Assoc. v. Montclair

Baldwin Const. Co. v. Essex Cty. Bd. of Taxation, 24 N.J. Super. 252, 274 (Law Div. 1952), aff'd 27 N.J.…

Paterson Redevelopment Agency v. Schulman

Even if there are constitutional implications in the issues presented, it is well settled that the mere…