From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Musgrove v. Hanifin

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 18, 2021
20-cv-00614-GPC (S.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-00614-GPC

10-18-2021

IRVIN MUSGROVE, Plaintiff, v. ANGIE HANIFIN, MARGERY PIERCE, KEYSA MACHADO, SUSANA SANDOVAL-SOTO, AND OCEANSIDE HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS

[ECF No. 131]

Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel United States District Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to File Documents Late. ECF No. 131. Plaintiff has asked the Court to consider these additional documents when it evaluates Plaintiff's pending motion for leave to file an amended complaint, ECF No. 125, along with Defendants' pending motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Sixth Amended Complaint, ECF No. 117.

The Court has carefully reviewed the documents Plaintiff appended to the instant motion, which he wishes to supplement the papers he has filed related to the pending motions. See ECF No. 131 at 2-6. The Court finds that the additional details Mr. Musgrove provided therein would be most appropriately appended to Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Seventh Amended Complaint (ECF No. 128). When Plaintiff replied (ECF No. 130) to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave (ECF No. 128), Plaintiff combined the briefing with his brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, and filed them in the same document (ECF No. 130).

Due to the complex procedural circumstances of multiple pending motions in this case, the Court finds it reasonable to allow Plaintiff to file additional documents for the Court to consider as part of his reply to Defendants' opposition to his motion for leave to amend. The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Documents Late, and takes the documents attached to the motion under consideration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Musgrove v. Hanifin

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 18, 2021
20-cv-00614-GPC (S.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Musgrove v. Hanifin

Case Details

Full title:IRVIN MUSGROVE, Plaintiff, v. ANGIE HANIFIN, MARGERY PIERCE, KEYSA…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Oct 18, 2021

Citations

20-cv-00614-GPC (S.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2021)