From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muse v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 3, 2004
888 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

affirming the appellant's conviction and sentence but remanding for correction of judgment and sentence to reflect conviction following jury trial rather than guilty plea

Summary of this case from Phelps v. State

Opinion

No. 1D04-1083.

December 3, 2004.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Judge Karen K. Cole.

Appellant, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The public defender's office filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We agree there are no arguable issues on appeal and affirm. We, however, remand this cause for correction of a scrivener's error on the written robbery judgment. The judgment erroneously indicates the appellant, Derrick Muse, entered a plea of guilty. The record shows that the appellant was found guilty of the charge by jury. The trial court is therefore directed to correct the written judgment. This cause is affirmed in all other respects.

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of scrivener's error.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Muse v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 3, 2004
888 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

affirming the appellant's conviction and sentence but remanding for correction of judgment and sentence to reflect conviction following jury trial rather than guilty plea

Summary of this case from Phelps v. State
Case details for

Muse v. State

Case Details

Full title:Derrick MUSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 3, 2004

Citations

888 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Phelps v. State

However, because it is clear that appellant's judgment and sentence erroneously reflect that he entered a…