From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muscanell v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Feb 19, 2016
186 So. 3d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 5D15–1972.

02-19-2016

Ryan MUSCANELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Ryan Muscanell, Graceville, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Ryan Muscanell, Graceville, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion

EDWARDS, J.

Ryan Muscanell appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence for County Jail Credit. Because the records attached to the lower court's order do not conclusively refute Appellant's claim, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Appellant timely filed his motion, relying upon Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.801 and 3.850, alleging that he was entitled to additional jail credit. He attached bond paperwork that stated his date of arrest on the relevant charges was June 7, 2013. The State points out that the arrest affidavit is dated June 26, 2013. Therefore, the State argues that the bond paperwork was incorrectly dated. The State asserts that the paperwork should have listed June 27, 2013 as the first date of incarceration.

The postconviction court's order notes and denies Appellant's claim that he was arrested on June 7, 2013. The bond paperwork and the arrest affidavit, each containing a different arrest date, were attached to the order. The court's order does not address or attempt to resolve the conflicting documents. Accordingly, the record attached to the lower court's order does not conclusively refute Appellant's allegations; therefore, summary denial was error. Adkins v. State, 183 So.3d 1102 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). We reverse the summary denial and order the lower court to attach records which conclusively refute Appellant's claim of entitlement to additional jail. If that cannot be accomplished, the lower court shall schedule an evidentiary hearing to resolve the discrepancy noted by Appellant.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Muscanell v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Feb 19, 2016
186 So. 3d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Muscanell v. State

Case Details

Full title:RYAN MUSCANELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 19, 2016

Citations

186 So. 3d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Walker v. State

We reverse and remand for the trial court to attach records conclusively refuting Appellant's claim of…

Walker v. State

We reverse and remand for the trial court to attach records conclusively refuting Appellant's claim of…