From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murtha v. Kalhorn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1997
237 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 24, 1997.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated June 12, 1996, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Before: Miller, J.P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff met his burden of demonstrating the existence of factual issues with respect to whether he suffered a "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The medical reports from the Plaintiff's treating physicians and the more recent report submitted by the plaintiff's treating chiropractor present objective quantified evidence of the extent or degree of limitation with respect to the use of the plaintiff's dorsolumbar spine and the duration of the limitation ( see, Bates v Peeples, 171 AD2d 635; Swenning v Wankel, 140 AD2d 428).


Summaries of

Murtha v. Kalhorn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1997
237 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Murtha v. Kalhorn

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MURTHA, Respondent, v. DIANE KALHORN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 905

Citing Cases

ZITO v. MORIARTY

Where, as here, plaintiffs submit an expert's medical affidavit which demonstrates the objective tests…

Agosta v. Fast Sys. Corp.

The third counterclaim for tortious interference with a business relationship also fails to state a cause of…