From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murry v. Serafino

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Oct 4, 2023
4:23-cv-00683-P-BJ (N.D. Tex. Oct. 4, 2023)

Opinion

4:23-cv-00683-P-BJ

10-04-2023

James Murry, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Waddell Serafino, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MARK T. PITTMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. ECF No. 24. No timely objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

The Court therefore ORDERS that Plaintiff's case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Court also ORDERS that Plaintiff Lakisha Edmond be declared a vexatious litigant and ORDERS that Plaintiff Lakisha Edmond be required to seek leave of court by motion before she is permitted to file any additional complaints in this district.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murry v. Serafino

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Oct 4, 2023
4:23-cv-00683-P-BJ (N.D. Tex. Oct. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Murry v. Serafino

Case Details

Full title:James Murry, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Waddell Serafino, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Oct 4, 2023

Citations

4:23-cv-00683-P-BJ (N.D. Tex. Oct. 4, 2023)