From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 2, 1992
420 S.E.2d 752 (Ga. 1992)

Opinion

S92A1014.

DECIDED OCTOBER 2, 1992.

Murder. Chatham Superior Court. Before Judge Head.

Mark J. Nathan, for appellant.

Spencer Lawton, Jr., District Attorney, Larry Chisolm, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Peggy R. Katz, Staff Attorney, for appellee.


This is the second appearance of this case before the court. In Murray v. State, 261 Ga. 824 ( 413 S.E.2d 453) (1992), we remanded the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on appellant's claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Such a hearing was conducted by the trial court on March 9, 1992 and the claim was denied on March 16, 1992. Appellant appeals from that denial and we affirm.

A notice of appeal was filed on March 19, 1992. The case was docketed in this court on May 12, 1992 and, on June 26, 1992, was submitted for decision without oral argument.

1. Appellant's first three enumerations of error are without merit in that they were raised, litigated and decided adversely to him in the case's previous appearance before this court. Accord Murray, 261 Ga. 824 (2).

2. The final enumeration concerns the effectiveness of the assistance provided by trial counsel. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 ( 104 S.C. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674) (1984) sets forth the standard by which such claims are to be measured and requires one asserting such an error to make two affirmative showings: that counsel's performance was deficient and that such deficiency prejudiced the defense. Id. at 687; see also Jowers v. State, 260 Ga. 459 ( 396 S.E.2d 891) (1990).

On remand to the trial court for a hearing on the effectiveness of trial counsel, appellant reasserted what he contends are deficiencies in trial counsel's performance. However, he did not attempt to establish that those claimed deficiencies prejudiced the defense. As a result, appellant failed to satisfy the requirements of Washington and his claim of ineffective assistance was correctly denied.

Judgment affirmed. Clarke, C. J., Bell, P. J., Hunt, Benham and Sears-Collins, JJ., concur.


DECIDED OCTOBER 2, 1992.


Summaries of

Murray v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 2, 1992
420 S.E.2d 752 (Ga. 1992)
Case details for

Murray v. State

Case Details

Full title:MURRAY v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 2, 1992

Citations

420 S.E.2d 752 (Ga. 1992)
420 S.E.2d 752