From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Oct 2, 2008
No. 08-06-00290-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 2, 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-06-00290-CR

October 2, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from 416th District Court of Collin County, Texas, (TC #416-82521-05).

Before CHEW, C.J., McCLURE, and CARR, JJ.


OPINION


Freddie Clarence Murray, pro se, appeals his conviction of indecency with a child. A jury found Appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for a term of twenty years. We affirm. Appellant chose to represent himself at trial and on appeal after being fully admonished by the trial court of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Collier v. State, 959 S.W.2d 621, 625 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997). Appellant has not filed a brief on his behalf in this appeal. On March 14, 2007, we ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing in accordance with TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(b). The trial court determined that Appellant wished to prosecute the appeal but he persisted in his desire to proceed on appeal without the assistance of counsel. Despite being given extensions of time, Appellant did not file a brief. We therefore submitted the case without the benefit of briefs. TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(b)(4). In the interest of justice, we have reviewed the entire record. See Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994). Having found no unassigned fundamental error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.


Summaries of

Murray v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Oct 2, 2008
No. 08-06-00290-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Murray v. State

Case Details

Full title:FREDDIE CLARENCE MURRAY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso

Date published: Oct 2, 2008

Citations

No. 08-06-00290-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 2, 2008)