From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Orange Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 24, 2020
18 CIVIL 442 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 442 (NSR)

06-24-2020

MICHAEL MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE COUNTY, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, and DR. SORREL FELDMAN, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated June 23, 2020, Defendants' motion to dismiss the SAC pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. Given that this is Plaintiff's third pleading, the dismissal is with prejudice. Dated: New York, New York

June 24, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Murray v. Orange Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 24, 2020
18 CIVIL 442 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Murray v. Orange Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE COUNTY, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 24, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 442 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2020)