From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Godin

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Mar 2, 2007
No. 3:04-CV-501 (Phillips/Guyton) (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 2, 2007)

Opinion

No. 3:04-CV-501 (Phillips/Guyton).

March 2, 2007


ORDER


At trial in the above captioned matter, defendants, Amanda Godin, Kenneth Mynatt, and Jason Mynatt, moved for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with respect to plaintiffs' claims against the defendants in their individual capacities. A judgment as a matter of law may be granted if there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party on that issue or claim.

For the reasons stated in open court, defendants' motion is GRANTED, and the claims against all defendants in their individual capacities are DISMISSED from the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murray v. Godin

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Mar 2, 2007
No. 3:04-CV-501 (Phillips/Guyton) (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 2, 2007)
Case details for

Murray v. Godin

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY MURRAY, BILLY D. MURRAY and LORETTA MURRAY, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICER…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville

Date published: Mar 2, 2007

Citations

No. 3:04-CV-501 (Phillips/Guyton) (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 2, 2007)