From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. City of Trenton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:11cv417 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:11cv417

02-25-2013

Danean Murray, Plaintiff, v. City of Trenton Defendant.


Bowman, M.J.


ORDER

The parties having reached an agreement to settle this litigation;

It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.

The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Stephanie K. Bowman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Murray v. City of Trenton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:11cv417 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Murray v. City of Trenton

Case Details

Full title:Danean Murray, Plaintiff, v. City of Trenton Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:11cv417 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 25, 2013)