From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray B. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Nov 20, 2018
Docket no. 2:18-cv-030-NT (D. Me. Nov. 20, 2018)

Opinion

Docket no. 2:18-cv-030-NT

11-20-2018

MURRAY B., Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On November 5, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. (ECF No. 23). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the Commissioner's Decision is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Nancy Torresen

United States Chief District Judge Dated this 20th day of November, 2018.


Summaries of

Murray B. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Nov 20, 2018
Docket no. 2:18-cv-030-NT (D. Me. Nov. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Murray B. v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:MURRAY B., Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Nov 20, 2018

Citations

Docket no. 2:18-cv-030-NT (D. Me. Nov. 20, 2018)

Citing Cases

Patrick S. v. Saul

Here, because the ALJ relied exclusively on one job to satisfy Defendant's burden at step 5, and Plaintiff's…