From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Sep 19, 2000
30 S.W.3d 192 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED77470

Date: September 19, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. WILSON.

Lisa M. Stroup, 1221 Locust Street, Ste. 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

John Munson Morris, III, Assistant Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before Mary K. Hoff, C.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Robert E. Crist, Sr. J.


Movant, Steven Murphy, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Murphy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Sep 19, 2000
30 S.W.3d 192 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Murphy v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN MURPHY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Sep 19, 2000

Citations

30 S.W.3d 192 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)