From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Shasta Community Health Center

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 8, 2015
2:13-CV-0412-CMK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2015)

Opinion

          MARK S. POSARD, MOLLIE BURKS-THOMAS, GORDON & REES LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants SHASTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER AND DR. RON SAND.

          ANTHONY J. POIDMORE, LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY J. POIDMORE A professional law corporation, Roseville, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff KATHLEEN MURPHY.


          STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

          CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, Plaintiff KATHLEEN MURPHY and Defendants SHASTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER and DR. RON SAND by and through their counsel of record, that this Court enter a dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(ii), with each party to bear its own fees and costs.

         ORDER

         Pursuant to stipulation by the parties, the parties' joint stipulation is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this action.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Shasta Community Health Center

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 8, 2015
2:13-CV-0412-CMK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Murphy v. Shasta Community Health Center

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. SHASTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, DR RON…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 8, 2015

Citations

2:13-CV-0412-CMK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2015)