From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Pfeiffer Glass, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 1960
11 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

July 1, 1960

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ. [ 15 Misc.2d 214.]


Order of August 14, 1958, unanimously modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion by reducing the amount of commissions allowed from $4,000 to $1,000, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: It cannot be determined from this record whether the receiver was appointed pursuant to section 1547 of the Civil Practice Act or section 150 of the General Corporation Law. However, it is unnecessary to decide this question upon this appeal. Special Term properly held that the two intermediate orders allowing commissions to the receiver, to which no opposition was made and from which no appeals were taken, should not be reviewed on the motion to settle the receiver's accounts. We believe, however, that the final allowance of $4,000 for commissions to the receiver was an improvident exercise of Special Term's discretion and we, therefore, reduce this amount to $1,000.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Pfeiffer Glass, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 1960
11 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Murphy v. Pfeiffer Glass, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GRACE E. MURPHY, Respondent-Appellant, v. PFEIFFER GLASS, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Citing Cases

State v. Chatsworth Realty Corp.

While it is not clear that the receivership at issue is in fact a CPLR receivership, and our prior decision…

In re Woodlawn MRI Services, Inc.

Those motions were granted without opposition. Since Sullivan did not challenge the propriety of the interim…