From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MURPHY v. MID EAST OIL COMPANY

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 14, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-1343 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2007)

Summary

dismissing conversion claim because it was dependent on the defendant's noncompliance with the terms of the agreements

Summary of this case from Fedex Ground Package SYST.v. Applications Intl. Corp.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-1343.

February 14, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2007, after the plaintiffs filed a complaint in the above-captioned case, and after the defendants submitted a partial motion to dismiss the complaint, and after a Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the parties were granted thirteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the pleadings, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' partial motion to dismiss the complaint (Document No. 20) is granted as to Counts III and IV and denied in all other respects.


Summaries of

MURPHY v. MID EAST OIL COMPANY

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 14, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-1343 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2007)

dismissing conversion claim because it was dependent on the defendant's noncompliance with the terms of the agreements

Summary of this case from Fedex Ground Package SYST.v. Applications Intl. Corp.

dismissing conversion claim because it was dependent on the defendant's noncompliance with the terms of the agreements

Summary of this case from Rahemtulla v. Hassam
Case details for

MURPHY v. MID EAST OIL COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:HARRIET MURPHY and WILLIAM MURPHY, individually and on behalf of a class…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 14, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-1343 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2007)

Citing Cases

Rahemtulla v. Hassam

Nonetheless, courts have applied the "gist of the action" doctrine to conversion claims when entitlement to…

Troxler v. Capital One Bank (Usa), N.A.

" Universal Premium Acceptance Corp. v. York Bank & Trust Co., 69 F.3d 695, 704 (3d Cir.1995); McKeeman v.…